Originally published on DailyKos, and republished here by permission of the author.

Back in 2008 I wrote two little noticed diaries about speculative buying that helped to drive food prices higher (here and here), and surprise, surprise, our friends from Goldman Sachs are well represented in this mix of global finance companies.

Two years later, the world food market is still seriously exposed to speculators artificially driving up prices and worsening the risks of malnutrition, and according to one of the world’s leading agricultural researchers, Joachim von Braun, the head of the International Food Policy Research Institute (von Brown was one of the first to write about flawed regulatory regimes in banking and finance driving up food prices) an even bigger food crisis is looming, exacerbated as well by climate change. A visit to his site is well worth your time as he speaks eloquently about food and water.

The food crisis of 2007/2008 is now well documented. According to Paul Jay, from 2007 to 2008 the price of maize in Ethiopia went up 141 percent, retail wheat flour in Peshawar, Pakistan, went up 82 percent, rice in Thailand up 73 percent and this had little to do with supply and demand and much more to do with speculation by the usual suspects.

In March of 2008 the price of food commodities hit an all-time high, sending 100 million people into the ranks of the hungry, worldwide.

"They cut off my clothes with some kind of doctor’s scalpel. I was totally naked … They took the scalpel to my right chest. It was only a small cut. Maybe an inch. Then they cut my left chest. One of them took my penis in his hand and began to make cuts. He did it once, and they stood still for maybe a minute, watching my reaction. I was in agony, crying, trying desperately to suppress myself, but I was screaming … They must have done this 20 to 30 times in maybe two hours. There was blood all over. They cut all over my private parts. One of them said it would be better just to cut it off, as I would only breed terrorists. This was repeated many times over the next 15 months … "

These are the words of Binyam Mohamed, an Ethiopian-Briton who was just released from Guantanamo, detailing his extraordinary rendition to Morocco. Morocco was chosen for two reasons. CIA wanted a confession related to the "dirty bomb plot," and thought if anyone could extract it, the Moroccans could.

TV was rammed down my throat this past weekend. Our new Internet Service Provider insists that we can not get our beloved surfing without the accompanying cable. The system is free, advanced and flows through fiber optics we are told. The screen was there for movies anyway so, viola, there I was soaking in cable TV all my own for the first time in my life.

The History Channel on HD is incredibly colorful and absorbing. After a whole day of gazing I progressed to listening to the contents of the programming. Before long I realized why I had avoided television for so long. The fact that all the programming is focused on religion can be excused by the timing of my surrender to cable. However, the History Channel’s attempt to do serious investigation of biblical history was horrifying in its lack of realism.

Yes reality is in the eye of the powerful. The biblical programming is probably regurgitating most of the propagandist history papers that are published in US theological and history departments. However, there should be basic, commonly agreed20to objective methods of historical investigation that any programmer of such documentaries must follow – or maybe not.

Western policy in the horn

In the last days of his government, Mengistu Hailemariam sat in front of the Ethiopian parliament and explained why the capture by rebels of a hill four hours drive north of the capital city did not signal defeat for his regime. He reasoned that the reality of military engagement meant that hills are captured and lost all the time with little implication. Never mind that the rebels had one tenth the number of soldiers as the government, and that they were essentially equipped with captured government weapons. He continued to state that even the defeat at Afabet in Eritrea, which astute commentators of the time predicted would be Ethiopia’s Dien Bien Phu, really meant little since Afabet was a small town of 700 inhabitants. Never mind that it contained the largest Ethiopian garrison in Eritrea outside Asmara with the most elite of the Ethiopian fighting force, Nadew ez, within it.

Such egregious miscalculations by policy makers and leaders happen all too often. Typically they lead to the unnecessary extension of violence and suffering without having much altering impact on the final results.